<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pass the Source &#187; moblin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://passthesource.org.nz/tag/moblin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://passthesource.org.nz</link>
	<description>Free software today</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 05:42:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Now for Moblin</title>
		<link>http://passthesource.org.nz/2009/07/16/now-for-moblin/</link>
		<comments>http://passthesource.org.nz/2009/07/16/now-for-moblin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 05:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Don Christie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moblin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://passthesource.org.nz/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll be brief. The Moblin project is at Beta 2.0 which these days usually means &#8220;been in production for a couple of years&#8221;. Having been to the project site I had very high hopes for this distro.
Moblin is not afraid to buck trends and my very brief trial of Moblin would suggest that, yes, this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be brief. The <a title="Moblin" href="http://moblin.org/" target="_blank">Moblin project</a> is at Beta 2.0 which these days usually means &#8220;been in production for a couple of years&#8221;. Having been to the project site I had very high hopes for this distro.</p>
<p>Moblin is not afraid to buck trends and my very brief trial of Moblin would suggest that, yes, this very much is a beta. It lacks polish and clarity and seems flaky. Windows users will know what I mean.</p>
<p>The Moblin interface is very iconic. I guess they have tried to take a leaf from the <a title="Sugar Home" href="http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sugar-home-view-0.82.jpg" target="_blank">XO Sugar</a> project but I think they have missed the point. Instead of creating an elegant intuitive UI they have created a pretty but very dumbed down experience. To say this is frustrating is an understatement. Whilst I am sure any technical problems can be easily ironed out I do not believe the UI approach is encouraging or sustainable.</p>
<p>All the above said, it could also be that Moblin is not really a Netbook OS but more of a palm/smartphone OS. If that is the case then it is <strong>very</strong> fit for purpose.</p>
<p>Screen grabs and blog &#8211; <a href="http://moblin.org/community/blogs/imad/2009/moblin-v20-beta-netbooks-and-nettops-its-here" target="_blank">http://moblin.org/community/blogs/imad/2009/moblin-v20-beta-netbooks-and-nettops-its-here</a>.</p>
<p>Apologies for my little lie in my last post. I hope to get onto Arch next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://passthesource.org.nz/2009/07/16/now-for-moblin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
